The death penalty provides for retribution against perpetrators and makes sure that they pay for their actions.
Share1 Shares 1K The existence of the death penalty in any society raises one underlying question: The lister has set out to examine both sides of the debate over the ethics and legality of capital punishment, especially in the US, and chooses neither side in any of the following entries.
They are not presented in any meaningful order. It Teaches the Condemned Nothing What is the purpose of punishment? We take our lead from one major source, our parents—and they no doubt took their lead from their own parents.
When your young child emulates what he just saw in a Rambo movie, you give him a stern lecture about what is real and what is not, what is acceptable in real life and what is not. When your child tries some crazy acrobatic move off a piece of furniture and hurts himself, you might spank him to be sure that he remembers never to do it again.
So when the child grows up, breaks into a home, and steals electronics, he gets caught and goes to prison. His time in prison is meant to deprive him of the freedom to go where he wants anywhere in the world, and to do what he wants when he wants.
This is the punishment, and most people do learn from it. In general, no one wants to go back. But if that child grows up and murders someone for their wallet or just for fun, and they are in turn put to death, they are taught precisely nothing, because they are no longer alive to learn from it.
We cannot rehabilitate a person by killing him or her. It is the Ultimate Warning Nevertheless, if would-be criminals know undoubtedly that they will be put to death should they murder with premeditation, very many of them are much less inclined to commit murder.
Whether or not would-be criminals are wary of committing the worst crime is an important—and probably impossible—question to answer. Murder still happens very frequently.
So some criminals disregard this warning for various reasons. In a larger sense, capital punishment is the ultimate warning against all crimes. If the criminal knows that the justice system will not stop at putting him to death, then the system appears more draconian to him.
Hence, he is less inclined to break and enter. He may have no intention of killing anyone in the process of robbing them, but is much more apprehensive about the possibility if he knows he will be executed. Thus, there is a better chance that he will not break and enter in the first place.
It Does Not Dissuade If the foreknowledge of any punishment is meant to dissuade the criminal from committing the crime, why do people still murder others? The US had a murder rate of 4. If it does not dissuade, then it serves no purpose.
The warning of life in prison without parole must equally dissuade criminals.
It Provides Closure for Victims There are many victims of a single murder. The criminal gets caught, tried, and convicted, and it is understood that the punishment will be severe. But the person he has killed no longer has a part to play in this.
Unfortunately, the murderer has deprived his family and friends of a loved one. Their grief begins with the murder. A system in place for the purpose of granting justice cannot do so for the surviving victims, unless the murderer himself is put to death.
It Is Hypocritical It is strange that a nation would denounce the practice of murder by committing the very same act. True—as a whole, we are not murderers, and understandably refuse to be placed in the same category as someone like Ted Bundy. But to many opponents of the death penalty, even Ted Bundy should have been given life without parole.
The fact that he murdered at least thirty people—for the mere reason that he enjoyed doing it—has no bearing on the hypocrisy, the flagrant dishonesty, of the declaration that such a person deserves to be killed because he had no right to kill.
If the goal of any punishment, as stated above, is to teach us those things we should not do, then the justice system should more adequately teach the criminality of killing by refusing to partake in it.
It was obvious that he feared being put to death. He did his best to avert it. This means that he did not fear life in prison—at least not as much as he feared capital punishment.Video: Arguments For and Against Capital Punishment The use of capital punishment in the United States has fluctuated throughout the years.
The death penalty is a controversial criminal law topic. Capital punishment is the lawful infliction of death as a punishment and since ancient times it has been used for a wide variety of offences. The Bible prescribes death for murder and many other crimes including kidnapping and witchcraft.
Jul 31, · The most common and most cogent argument against capital punishment is that sooner or later, innocent people will get killed, because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system.
Capital punishment is the lawful infliction of death as a punishment and since ancient times it has been used for a wide variety of offences. The Bible prescribes death for murder and many other crimes including kidnapping and witchcraft.
Video: Arguments For and Against Capital Punishment The use of capital punishment in the United States has fluctuated throughout the years.
The death penalty is a controversial criminal law topic. Feb 19, · One of the best arguments for the death penalty is that capital punishment is a huge deterrent we have to prevent others from committing heinous crimes.
The best way to deal with crime obviously is to stop it from happening in the first schwenkreis.coms: